Cases 71 - 80 of 573
Crosby v. Warden at RCC et al
as 3:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
Michael Crosby
Respondent:
Warden at RCC and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fernandez-Morales v. Currier et al
as 3:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Yoandy Fernandez-Morales
Defendant:
Currier, Dr Omandac, Dr Minev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Shaunta C. Crosby
Respondent:
H.L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Holifield v. Stephenson et al
as 4:2023cv10194
Plaintiff:
George Holifield
Defendant:
George Stephenson, Crosby and Edwards
Crosby v. Ray
as 4:2023cv00073
Petitioner:
Shaunta C. Crosby
Respondent:
H.L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) Martinez v. California State Prison CMF et al
as 2:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Fred Feleki Martinez
Defendant:
California State Prison CMF, Jones, Sac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Katherine Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al
as 22-17022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, LINDSEY, SHIFT COMMAND and others
Price v. Centurion of Delaware, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01635
Plaintiff:
Millard E. Price
Defendant:
Centurion of Delaware, LLC, Correct RX Pharmacy Services, Inc., Monroe Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosby v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2022cv03119
Petitioner:
Gregory D Cosby, Gregory D Cosmo Crosby and Gregory D Crosby
Respondent:
A. Ciolli, AW Programs Complex, CMC Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04453
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
