Cases 71 - 80 of 525
Emerson v. Salyer et al
as 4:2022cv00332
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eric Emerson
Defendant:
Unknown Salyer, Natalya Weigel and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EMERSON v. USA
as 1:2022cv01482
Petitioner:
SHERMAN EMERSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jaramillo v. Pace et al
as 6:2022cv00256
Plaintiff:
Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr.
Defendant:
Pamela Pace, Daniel Comeaux, LVN Wanda Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunter v. Emerson
as 1:2022cv02380
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Bernard Hunter, III
Defendant:
Judge Emerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITAKER v. EMERSON
as 1:2022cv01083
Petitioner:
MICHAEL AARON WHITAKER
Respondent:
DONALD EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv01446
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Bernard Hunter, III
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, City of Adel, Cook County, GA, City of Douglasville, Douglas County, GA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emerson v. Denton County Medical Staff et al
as 4:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
James W. Emerson
Defendant:
Denton County Medical Staff and Denton County Jail Food Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norton v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00128
Petitioner:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Respondent:
Estella Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Conger v. Houser
as 2:2022cv00003
Petitioner:
Emerson Scott Conger
Respondent:
Earl L. Houser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Norton v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Daniel Emerson Norton
Defendant:
Estella Derr, Dr. Kwon and Mr. Robl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
