Cases 71 - 80 of 207
Cohea v. Ducart et al
as 3:2018cv03349
Plaintiff:
Danny James Cohea
Defendant:
C. E. Ducart, S. Curtis, D. Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2018cv00103
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. ANDERSON
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA , FRED B. MILLER , PAULA M. AIGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2018cv01873
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. ANDERSON
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, FRED B. MILLER, PAULA M. AIGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. USA
as 1:2018cv10756
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gary J. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Joseph Morgan v. Mark Patterson, et al
as 18-40333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH RODERICK MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK PATTERSON, E. BARRERA, J. ANDERSON and others
Temple Anderson v. Wency Black, et al
as 18-40202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TEMPLE J. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WENCY BLACK, Beto Unit, LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and BRUCE TONEY, Office of the Inspector General (OIC)
Apodaca v. Speidell et al
as 1:2018cv00083
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. Apodaca
Defendant:
S. Speidell, S. Brown, A. Waybright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Black et al
as 6:2017cv00672
Plaintiff:
Temple J Anderson
Defendant:
Wency Black, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and Bruce Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Black et al
as 3:2017cv03068
Plaintiff:
Temple J Anderson
Defendant:
Wency Black, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and Bruce Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfred Anderson v. San Francisco County Jail, et al
as 17-16849
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALFRED J. ANDERSON
Respondent - Appellee:
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY JAIL, MANUEL MENDEZ and JOHN ZEHAR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
