Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Harris v. Cooper et al
as 2:2009cv07708
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris
Defendant:
Lynn Cooper
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Miller-Stout
as 2:2009cv00235
Petitioner:
Ian Michael Harris
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Witherow v. Dorla Salling, et al
as 09-16307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WITHEROW
Defendant - Appellee:
DORLA SALLING, MARY VIETH, THOMAS GOODSON and others
Luther Harris v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-40592
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUTHER MICHAEL HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Harris v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv02383
Petitioner:
Michael Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MCBRIDE v. KASABACK et al
as 3:2009cv00066
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HARRY MCBRIDE
Defendant:
JOHN MARK KASABACK and GERALD LONG
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Witherow v. Salling et al
as 3:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
John Witherow
Defendant:
Dorla Salling, Mary Vieth, Thomas Goodson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00421
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. Gonzalez
as 3:2008cv02177
Petitioner:
Michael Harris
Respondent:
F Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. Quarterman
as 08-40896
Petitioner - Appellant:
LUTHER MICHAEL HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
