Cases 71 - 80 of 264
Smith v. Interstate Commission of Adult Offender Supervision et al
as 2:2017cv04770
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Ken Christesen, Unknown Bobchak and others
Plaintiff:
Cheri Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Profitt v. Howe et al
as 3:2017cv07136
Petitioner:
Marvin Profitt
Respondent:
Rob Howe, Lake County Probation Department and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAVIS v. CAMDEN COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT
as 1:2017cv11485
Plaintiff:
BOBBY DAVIS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
DOUGLAS v. AGUDELO et al
as 2:2017cv07278
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE M. DOUGLAS
Defendant:
JANNETH T. AGUDELO and UNKNOWN PARTY OF THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Couturier v. The Presiding Judge Of LA Sup, et al
as 17-56376
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT STEPHEN COUTURIER
Respondent - Appellee:
THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CHIEF OFFICERS OF THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Pearson v. U.S. Marshal et al
as 6:2017cv00036
Petitioner:
Theron Pearson
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal Service and Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Castaneira v. Arnold et al
as 5:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Andrew W. Castaneira
Defendant:
S. Andrew Arnold, Matthew Yanni, Berkeley County Prosecuting Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zambrella v. Ward et al
as 6:2017cv00233
Petitioner:
Taurus Zambrella
Respondent:
Ward, FBOP and U.S. Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ronald S. Kaczmarek v. Los Angeles County Probation Department
as 5:2017cv00832
Petitioner:
Ronald S. Kaczmarek
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Probation Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
