Cases 71 - 80 of 1,007
Monzon v. Carr, et al.
as 1:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
Elizabeth Carr, Timothy Green, Kevin McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Peets v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv06962
Plaintiff:
Norberto Peets
Defendant:
City of New York, Claude Staten, William Fullam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glover v. Roman et al
as 3:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Dayquon Glover
Defendant:
Roman, Davis, Warden Gittere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Long v. United States et al
as 1:2023cv01117
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Long
Defendant:
United States, California, Stanislaus County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monzon v. Branch
as 1:2023cv00994
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
Joseph Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Rosas-Martinez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2023cv00287
Petitioner:
Roman Rosas-Martinez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Roman et al
as 1:2023cv04863
Plaintiff:
Milton Anderson
Defendant:
L. Roman and Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rice v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2023cv01094
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rice
Defendant:
Nicholas Gonzales, Robert Marquez, Daniella Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Rice v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2023cv01421
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rice
Defendant:
Nicholas Gonzales, Robert Marquez, Daniella Roman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale-El v. Adams County Fire Rescue, et al
as 23-1228
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLBY JEROME HALE-EL
Defendant / Appellee:
ADAMS COUNTY FIRE RESCUE, LT. CHRIS HUTTRER, STEVEN MENDIOLA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
