Cases 71 - 80 of 86
McPherson v. Wenzel et al
as 1:2012cv01001
Plaintiff:
Sarah Ann McPherson
Defendant:
John Remon Wenzel and Richard C. Litman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders #305405 v. Smith et al
as 1:2011cv00892
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Sanders #305405
Defendant:
Willie O. Smith, Nannett Norwood, Erica Huss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wenzel v. IDOC et al
as 3:2011cv00260
Plaintiff:
Burt Wenzel
Defendant:
IDOC, Lawrence Dept of Corrections and Shawnee Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Doizaki et al
as 1:2010cv01658
Plaintiff:
Nour Griffin Evans
Defendant:
R. (I) Doizaki, R. Doizaki, L. (I) Emerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Twyne v. Dumanis et al
as 3:2010cv00747
Plaintiff:
Shawn Andre Twyne
Defendant:
Bonnie M Dumanis, Angela Barkin, James Simmons, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Gatson v. State of NJ, et al
as 09-4731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL GATSON
Plaintiff - Pro Se Appellee:
ANTHONY HANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ, ANNE MILGRAM, Attorney General, Individually and in her official Capacity, COUNTY OF SOMERSET and others
Harkins v. Campos et al
as 3:2009cv02460
Defendant:
Eric Campos, Pike County Correctional Facility, John Frawley and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Edward Harkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wenzel v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2009cv01927
Plaintiff:
Nick R Wenzel
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Maricopa County, Arizona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Isom v. Craig Lowe, et al
as 09-3163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN ISOM
Defendant - Appellee:
CRAIG A LOWE, ELIZA WENZEL, IRENE DOLITTLE and others
Mitchell v. Caruso et al
as 2:2009cv11467
Plaintiff:
Virgil Mitchell
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, George Pramstaller, Correctional Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
