Cases 71 - 80 of 1,183
PATE v. WARDEN
as 5:2022cv00172
Petitioner:
DETRA WILEY PATE
Respondent:
FCI MARIANNA and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wiley v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2022cv00939
Plaintiff:
Russell Brett Wiley
Defendant:
State of Texas, Bexar County and District Court 437/399
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiley v. Bexar County Jail
as 5:2022cv00940
Petitioner:
Russell Wiley
Respondent:
Bexar County Jail and Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Martinez
as 4:2022cv02941
Plaintiff:
Wiley Williams
Defendant:
Janet Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDIN v. PEAKE et al
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, OFFICER WILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
July v. Dowling
as 6:2022cv00214
Petitioner:
Wiley Gene July
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carroll v. Cain
as 3:2022cv00149
Petitioner:
Wiley Zachary Carroll
Respondent:
Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Wiley v. Dentist at Evans Correctional Inst. Jane Doe et al
as 4:2022cv02343
Plaintiff:
Randy Antonio Wiley
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist at Evans Correctional Institution, The South Carolina Department of Corrections, South Carolina Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Wiley v. Paxton et al
as 5:2022cv00189
Petitioner:
Anthony Bernard Wiley
Respondent:
Ken Paxton and Marsha McClane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiley v. Paxton et al
as 7:2022cv00065
Petitioner:
Anthony Bernard Wiley
Respondent:
Ken Paxton and Marsha McClane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
