Cases 81 - 90 of 339
Dennis Davis, Jr. v. Public Defenders Bd Caddo Prsh, et al
as 18-30845
Petitioner - Appellant:
DENNIS RAY DAVIS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
PUBLIC DEFENDERS BOARD CADDO PARISH, PAMELA J. SMART, JAY DIXON and others
Carter v. Texas
as 1:2018cv00517
Petitioner:
Brian A. Carter
Respondent:
David G. Gutierrez
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adam Locke v. David Beth, et al
as 18-1696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM A. LOCKE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID G. BETH, Kenosha County Sheriff, LIEUTENANT KLINKHAMMER and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BEDFORD
Williams v. Hochul, et al
as 1:2018cv00395
Plaintiff:
Desmond Williams
Defendant:
William J. Hochul, Jr., John E. Rogowski, Douglas E. Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Travis Williams v. Rebecca Swenson, et al
as 18-1638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS D. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
REBECCA SWENSON, KAREN BUTLER, Doctor, JAMES PARKER and others
Janice Taylor v. David Campbell, et al
as 18-15430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANICE SUE TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID G. CAMPBELL, CHARLES FLANAGAN and JOSEPH WAGONER
Taylor v. Campbell et al
as 2:2018cv00498
Plaintiff:
Janice Sue Taylor
Defendant:
David G Campbell , Charles Flanagan and Joseph Wagoner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. Charleston County et al
as 2:2017cv01958
Plaintiff:
Clark D Thomas and George K Nichols
Defendant:
Folly Beach, City of, Nathan S Williams, James W Smiley, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Caddo Parish et al
as 5:2018cv00084
Plaintiff:
Dennis Ray Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Public Defenders Board Caddo Parish, Pamela J Smart, Jay Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morales v. Davey et al
as 1:2017cv01673
Plaintiff:
Jose Lorenzo Morales
Defendant:
Dave Davey, J. Gallagher, R. Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
