Cases 81 - 90 of 101
Bealer v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv04908
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bealer
Defendant:
Salvador A Godinez, Michael Lemke, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Charles Windham v. Ronald Franklin et al
as 2:2013cv03004
Defendant:
Ms Assad, Miguel Enriquez, Ronald Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Windham
Smitherman v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2013cv10161
Plaintiff:
Harold Smitherman
Defendant:
Anthony J. Stevenson, Matthew M. Wisnewski, Matthew Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinkley v. Vail et al
as 3:2012cv05969
Plaintiff:
James M Hinkley
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Scott Russell, Kerry Arlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATTHEWS v. WARDEN JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 1:2012cv02517
Plaintiff:
BARRY LEWIS MATTHEWS
Defendant:
WARDEN JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herman Rene Ontiveros v. Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department et al
as 2:2012cv01921
Defendant:
Lee Baca, Evans, Gonzalez and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Rene Ontiveros
Wilder v. Doctor John Doe #1 et al
as 2:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
Gary D. Wilder
Defendant:
Doctor John Doe #1, Doctor Orbergon, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe 12 CV 0029 v. USA
as 1:2012cv00029
Petitioner:
John Doe 12 CV 0029
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gomez et al v. Sepiol et al
as 1:2011cv01017
Plaintiff:
Eddie Gomez, Olga Padilla and Elizabeth Padilla
Defendant:
Stanley Sepiol, A. Mucigrosso, A. Fusare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hearn et al v. Lancaster County et al
as 9:2011cv01074
Plaintiff:
Cody A Hearn and Christopher A Hearn
Defendant:
Lancaster County , Barry S Faile , Debbie Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
