Cases 81 - 90 of 412
(HC) Vasquez v. Godwin
as 2:2022cv00128
Petitioner:
Jorge Vasquez
Respondent:
Ron Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Goodlow v. Henderson et al
as 1:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ivan F. Goodlow
Defendant:
S. Henderson, J. Goddis, B. Barrales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Golston v. Godwin
as 2:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Terauchi Golston
Respondent:
Ron Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laforte v. Godwin, et al
as 3:2022cv00069
Petitioner:
Peter Patrick Laforte
Respondent:
R. Godwin and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sutter v. Garland et al
as 5:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shawn Louis Sutter
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Michael Carvajal, Warden S. Salmonson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Demetrius T. Freeman v. J. Zilliox et al
as 5:2022cv00097
Plaintiff:
Demetrius T. Freeman
Defendant:
Correctional Officer J. Zilliox, Lieutenant A. Garibay, Correctional Officer Christmas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens v Godwin
as 3:2021cv01249
Plaintiff:
David Terrence Stephens
Defendant:
John Godwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godwin v. Berger et al
as 4:2021cv00478
Plaintiff:
Roger Godwin and Adeeb Osama Laden
Defendant:
Gregory Berger, Christina Woehr, Thomas E Higgins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GODWIN v. GILBERT et al
as 2:2021cv00428
Plaintiff:
ROGER GODWIN
Defendant:
GILBERT, DUSTIN A. HOLMES, T.J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Godwin v. Godwin
as 1:2021cv00486
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Godwin and Adeeb Omar Osama Laiden
Defendant:
Charles O'Neal Godwin and Neal Godwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
