Cases 81 - 90 of 491
Mohamud v. Johnson et al
as 0:2016cv04043
Petitioner:
Yusuf A. Mohamud
Respondent:
Jeh Johnson , Jason Sieving , Loretta Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alvarado v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00113
Plaintiff:
Elias Alvarado
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baltazar v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
Javier Jesus Medina Baltazar
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
De Los Santos v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00111
Plaintiff:
Roberto Carlos De Los Santos
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ware v. Hawthorn et al
as 1:2016cv00489
Petitioner:
Ulysses T Ware
Respondent:
Zack J Hawthorn, Marcia A Crone, David A O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Gomez v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 2:2016cv04113
Plaintiff:
Jose Villa Gomez
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Unknown Cooper, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores-Lira v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00112
Petitioner:
Juan Antonio Flores-Lira
Respondent:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Benitez-Bustos v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00108
Petitioner:
Efrain Benitez-Bustos
Respondent:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Valenzuela v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00110
Plaintiff:
Roberto Guerrero-Valenzuela
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mohamed Yussuf v. Bret Johnson
as 16-20770
Petitioner - Appellant:
MOHAMED ABDI YUSSUF
Respondent - Appellee:
BRET A. JOHNSON, Acting United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Officer Director - Houston Division and LORETTA LYNCH, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
