Cases 81 - 90 of 821
Bias et al v. Skillet Catering Service
as 3:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
Michael Spencer Bias, Daniel Hinson, Kenneth Peyton and others
Defendant:
Skillet Catering Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blankenship v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Dominique Marquis Blankenship
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Taylor v. Bennett et al
as 3:2023cv02662
Plaintiff:
Diandre Marquis Taylor
Defendant:
Patrick Bennett and William Weier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Copez v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv02065
Plaintiff:
Marquis Copez
Defendant:
Ofc. George Wilson, Lt. Sean MacKenzie and Lt. Brandon Caple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Squalls v. MaCauley
as 4:2023cv11541
Petitioner:
Davonte Marquis Squalls
Respondent:
Matthew MaCauley
BRINKLEY v. USA
as 1:2023cv00499
Petitioner:
RAEKWON MARQUIS TAISHAWN BRINKLEY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Luster v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv01185
Petitioner:
Vernon Marquis-Mcghee Luster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Samuels v. Henry et al
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Menion Marquis Samuels
Defendant:
FNU Henry, FNU Pollock, FNU Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv02084
Petitioner:
Marquis Valantee Tate
Respondent:
D. Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holiday v. Unknown Officer or Officers of the San Diego Police Department
as 3:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Juan Marquis Holiday
Defendant:
Unknown Officer or Officers of the San Diego Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
