Cases 81 - 90 of 92
McCallister v. Valdez
as 3:2010cv01309
Plaintiff:
David Harold McCallister
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilliam v. Greenwood Professional Investigations Inc et al
as 4:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Reginald M Gilliam
Defendant:
Greenwood Professional Investigations Inc and Ronnie McCallister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ortiz v. McDonald et al
as 4:2010cv00047
Plaintiff:
Vincente Ortiz
Defendant:
Jim McDonald, Unknown Salazar, J Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Belvin v. McAllister, et al
as 6:2009cv01141
Plaintiff:
Patrick D. Belvin
Defendant:
Sheila M. McCallister, Colonel Hare, FNU Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Upthegrove v. Tubbs et al
as 3:2008cv00552
Plaintiff:
Samuel Upthegrove
Defendant:
Charles Tubbs, Paul Westerhaus, Ourada and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States v. Clinton Ross, II
as 08-1820
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Clinton Earl John Ross, II, also known as Matthew James McCallister
Jeffers v. McKinley et al
as 2:2007cv00180
Plaintiff:
Keith Jeffers
Defendant:
McKinley, McCallister, South Central Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Adamson et al
as 3:2007cv00819
Plaintiff:
BenYehudah Whitfield
Defendant:
C/O Adamson, Neil C. Bantican, R Baylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hubbard et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2007cv00745
Plaintiff:
Abdullah G. Hubbard, Robert Saunders, Mel McCallister and others
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Betty Burris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. Abinsay et al
as 2:2007cv00941
Plaintiff:
Edd Pryor
Defendant:
Paul Abinsay, Caroline Abinsay, Mary Kay Holthus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
