Cases 81 - 90 of 341
Roundtree Jr v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Rivera, John Doe, Cortez and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnial Lashawn Roundtree Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. MAYO CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ANNEX OFFICIALS et al
as 3:2020cv00001
Plaintiff:
DONNIE JACKSON and Ben-Shalom Yisrael YBY-BY
Defendant:
Security Intake Facilitators, MEDICAL, HUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Roundtree
as 1:2019cv00221
Petitioner:
Quint L. Evans
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roscoe v. Clarke et al
as 1:2019cv01536
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, T. Forman, D. C. Roundtree and others
Plaintiff:
Emmitt G. Roscoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2019cv00205
Defendant:
Parole Officer Christopher Weismon, John Doe, Sheriff Richard Roundtree and others
Plaintiff:
Dewaymon A. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roundtree v. Miller, et al
as 7:2019cv00125
Defendant:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID, Elbert Holmes, Sgt Banda and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence A Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2019cv00718
Defendant:
Elizabeth Britton, James LeBlanc, Randy Lavespere and others
Plaintiff:
Ellis Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Wynn et al
as 5:2019ct03276
Defendant:
Chaplain Wagner, Nurse Torro, Superintendent Herring and others
Plaintiff:
Offie Curtis Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Mayo Correctional Institution Annex Officials et al
as 1:2019cv23401
Plaintiff:
Donnie Jackson and Ben-Shalom Yisrael YBY-BY
Defendant:
Confinement Officials, Security Intake Facilitators, Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roundtree v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv01016
Petitioner:
Christopher Dion Roundtree
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
