Cases 81 - 90 of 397
Brown v. State of Michigan et al
as 5:2021cv10531
Defendant:
Deputy Wardens, Business Office, Classification Directors and others
Plaintiff:
Antrell V. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart v. Michigan
as 1:2021cv00194
Petitioner:
David Michael Stewart
Respondent:
State of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. State of Michigan et al
as 9:2021cv00072
Plaintiff:
Antrel Vonique Brown, Antrell Vonique Brown and Islamic Ali
Defendant:
Deputy Wardens, Business Office, Classification Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. Biden et al
as 7:2020cv00750
Defendant:
United States Voters Registration & Electorial Administration Services Washington D.C., Joe Biden, US Supreme Ct. and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jerore v. People of the State of Michigan
as 2:2020cv12989
Defendant:
People of the State of Michigan
Plaintiff:
Kyle D. Jerore
Brown v. State of Michigan et al
as 2:2020cv12905
Defendant:
Corizon, State Department of Corrections and State of Michigan
Plaintiff:
Antrell V. Brown
Moore v. State of Michigan
as 2:2020cv12891
Petitioner:
Mar'tell Moore
Respondent:
State of Michigan
Ward v. State of Texas
as 4:2020cv01065
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis Ward
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Missouri, State of New Mexico and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Rondale R. Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. People of the State of Michigan et al
as 1:2020cv00492
Defendant:
Unknown Jean, A. Herbert, Unknown Shnaildai and others
Plaintiff:
William J. Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gayles v. State of North Carolina Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00125
Plaintiff:
Devon Armond Gayles and Devon A. Gayles El
Defendant:
Tracy Boone, Paul L. Maloney, Mary Malesky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
