Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 132
Flores v. Adams et al
as 2:2012cv00258
Plaintiff: Johnny Flores, Jr
Defendant: John Adams, M Venable, NFN Stiemen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venable v. Ziglar et al
as 2:2012cv00668
Plaintiff: Johnny Lamont Venable, III
Defendant: Joan Ziglar, Valerie Washington and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Venable v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2012cv03493
Plaintiff: Anthony Venable
Defendant: Martin O'Malley and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venable v. Jackway
as 12-4655
Plaintiff - Appellant: Rason Venable
Defendant - Appellee: Recette, Superintendent, Lapint, Kevin Gazer and others
Roy Daniel, et al v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-5327
Plaintiff - Appellant: Roy A. Daniel, Alfonso Taylor, Harold Venable and others
Defendant - Appellee: Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Chairman of the United States Parole Commission, Cranston J. Mitchell, Commissioner of the United States Parole Commission and Patricia K. Cushwa, Commissioner of the United States Parole Commission
Richard Johnson v. Martha Maes, et al
as 12-10973
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD J JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee: MARTHA MAES, Sergeant, S.T.G., D. OWENS, S.T.G. and M. VENABLE, Sergeant, S.T.G.
Johnson v. Maes et al
as 2:2012cv00182
Plaintiff: Richard Johnson
Defendant: Martha E Maes, D Owens and M Venable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VENABLE v. USA
as 1:2012cv00885
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: ALLEN ROBERT VENABLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jefferson v. Woody et al
as 2:2012cv00397
Plaintiff: Darryl Lamont Jefferson
Defendant: C. T. Woody, Jr., Colonelle Burnett, Major Venable and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Venable
as 5:2012ct03107
Plaintiff: William S. Parker
Defendant: David Venable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?