Cases 81 - 90 of 1,207
Davis v. Weber
as 4:2023cv00077
Petitioner:
Bryce Davis
Respondent:
Scott Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wood v. Weber et al
as 1:2023cv00125
Defendant:
Yes Care, Warden R. Shane Weber, Asst. Warden Bradley O. Buttler and others
Plaintiff:
Shelton Lamont Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Miguel Angel Rivera v. Wayne Hill
as 23-6065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL A. RIVERA-ALVAREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR WAYNE O. HILL, WARDEN AT J.C.I. ALLEN GANG, SERGEANT AT J.C.I. MR. LEE and others
Block v. Fikes
as 0:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Waylen Block
Defendant:
J Fikes, Acting Warden, Acting Associate Warden's 1,2,3. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Cox v. Ronald Weber
as 23-6044
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD COX
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLEN GANG, MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL, WARDEN RONALD S. WEBER and others
Jones v. Weber et al
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Joshua Colonna Jones
Defendant:
Warden Ronald Shane Weber, Librarian Liam Kennedy and A.R.P. Coordinator Alicia Cartwright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Page, Emmanuel v. Bryant, Clinton et al
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Page
Defendant:
Clinton F. Bryant, L. Weber, Leinweber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brantner v. Collier et al
as 6:2022cv01251
Plaintiff:
Carlton E. Brantner
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Bruce L. Armstrong, Justin S. Wade and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Hale et al
as 2:2022cv01672
Plaintiff:
Jamall S Baker and Jamall Baker
Defendant:
laura lee hale, Valerie Weber and john hoag
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrew Dicks v. Ronald Weber
as 22-7311
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW JOSEPH DICKS
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD S. WEBER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
