Cases 1 - 10 of 1,610
Titus v. Akoo Brand et al
as 4:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Michael Iamsui Titus
Defendant:
Akoo Brand, Vladamir Putin, Tesla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan Newell v. Ja'barri Davis
as 24-6553
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN JAMES NEWELL, ROY G. DAVIDSON and ANTOINE JERROD WATKINS
Defendant:
JA'BARRI DAVIS, Correctional Officer, A. SINGLETON, Correctional Officer, SGT. JANE DOE DOWNEY and others
Michael Burgess v. State of Missouri, et al
as 24-1731
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Burgess
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Buchanan County, Missouri, City of St. Joseph, Missouri and others
Garcia v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Defendant:
CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO, COLORADO SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE, C.S.P.D. Officer and others
John v. Davidson
as 2:2024cv00727
Plaintiff:
Mayson James John
Defendant:
Orlan Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norman v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
Tony Norman
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office and D. Cantrgll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norman et al v. R. Edward et al
as 3:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Norman, Rooks Chazsity and Retic Jessica
Defendant:
R. Edward, J. William and Davidson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bryant Davis v. Darius Horton
as 24-6299
Plaintiff:
BRYANT E. DAVIS, a/k/a Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
DARIUS HORTON, EXPRESS FUNERAL FUNDING, LLC, HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
