Cases 1 - 10 of 411
Forbes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
Dennis A. Forbes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ivan McKinney v. Fitzgerald, et al
as 24-1552
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
SGT. FITZGERALD, OFFICER FORBES, GEORGE ROBINSON, Asst Administrator and others
Forbes v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Forbes
Defendant:
Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Genao v. Ruiz et al
as 1:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Gabino Genao
Defendant:
Elvis Ruiz, Jr., Kenneth Stukes, Robin Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Carpenter et al
as 3:2024cv50097
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Bernard and Terrell King
Defendant:
Monica Carpenter, Susan Tuell, Dr. Sy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. Alvin S. Glen Det. Cent et al
as 0:2024cv01054
Plaintiff:
David Forbes
Defendant:
Alvin S. Glen Det. Cent, Unknown Board Members, A.S.G.D.C. Board of Directors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Boykins v. Dortch et al
as 3:2024cv50056
Plaintiff:
Byron Boykins
Defendant:
Christine Brannon Dortch, Andrea Tack, Mr. Manzano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woody v. Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Woody
Defendant:
Keybo Taylor, Cleophas Atwater, J. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Punke et al
as 1:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
. Punke, . Henry, D. Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
