Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 847
Conner v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00645
Plaintiff: **Sanctioned/Barred* Albertus Conner, Jr
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor: TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
ABDUL v. CONNER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv21068
Plaintiff: JABBAAR MUHAAHID ABDUL
Defendant: Robert Conner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRITTEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00131
Plaintiff: CORDERRO R BRITTEN
Defendant: RICKY D DIXON, CONNER and SPREAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Compton v. Conner et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff: Rodney C. Compton
Defendant: J. Conner, A. Ross and FCI-Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant: CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff: ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNER v. LANDRY
as 1:2024cv01208
Plaintiff: ALBERTUS CONNER, JR.
Defendant: JEFF LANDRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conner v. USA
as 1:2024cv00131
Petitioner: Daniel Dewayne Conner
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Ian Conners
as 24-6364
Plaintiff: MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant: IAN CONNERS, FBOP Central Office Inmate Appeal Administrator
Honaker v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: Gerald Leon Honaker
Defendant: Sgt. W. E. Rose, Dep. J. A. Brooks, Dep. M. S. Altice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?