Cases 1 - 10 of 23,357
Alfred v. Bernstein et al
as 1:2024cv22395
Plaintiff:
Jerry Neil Alfred
Defendant:
Daniel J. Bernstein, Scott D. Egleston and Brian J. McCormack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Seals v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03360
Petitioner:
Daniel Seals
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Denelsbeck v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
John Denelsbeck, III
Defendant:
Ricardo Ramirez, Jeremy J. Delacruz and Daniel Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey v. Tibbs et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Daniel Mackey
Respondent:
Lt. Timothy Tibbs, Corporal Michael Costello and Capt. Steve Caudill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Keen et al
as 4:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
Derrick Edwards
Defendant:
Daniel Keen, Medical David Unknown, Medical Sarah Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
John Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
New York City, Mayor Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aaron Cantley v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1532
Plaintiff:
AARON DANIEL CANTLEY
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON and JOHN DOE
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv04319
Plaintiff:
"John" Does and Jane Does
Defendant:
New York City, Eric Adams, NYPD Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schaffer v. Hudgens et al
as 3:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Harold Schaffer
Defendant:
Caleb Hudgens, Steven White, Madison Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Williams
as 2:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kennedy
Defendant:
Cpl Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
