Cases 1 - 10 of 25,729
Jones v. Quiring
as 3:2024cv03073
Plaintiff:
Rayon Jones
Defendant:
J. Quiring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Brent M. v. Yarusso et al
as 1:2024cv21958
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Jones and Brent Micheal Jones
Defendant:
A. Yarusso, H. Fitoria, B. Campos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Merritts v. Blair County Prison et al
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Terry L. Merritts
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY PRISON, PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC., ABBIE TATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TIMBERLAKE v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN TIMBERLAKE
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID J. CLOSE, JAMES JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff:
Randy Rindahl
Defendant:
Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
Felix Jones-Hill v. Catherine Bauman
as 24-1444
Petitioner:
FELIX JONES-HILL
Respondent:
CATHERINE S. BAUMAN, Warden
MCMILLIAN v. JONES et al
as 4:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
XAVIER T MCMILLIAN
Defendant:
DELDRON JONES, BRANDON GRANGER and ISAAC REDDING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUSTON v. MITCHELL et al
as 5:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY MANDELA HOUSTON
Defendant:
OFFICER MITCHELL and DEPUTY WARDEN LATORSHA JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones (PS) v. Deines et al
as 1:2024cv01429
Plaintiff:
Adam Jones
Defendant:
Curtis Deines, April Ogley, Robert Dick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
W GIELOW, K PERKINS, J STREIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
