Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(PC) Miles v. Laursen et al
as 2:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Georgia Mills and Georgia Miles
Defendant:
Phillipa Larsen, Judge Ashby, Judge Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WORLTON et al v. USA
as 1:2022cv01569
Plaintiff:
CECILIA MARIE WORLTON, WILLIAM LAYNE WORLTON, BYRON E. BRIMM and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Laursen v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 4:2020cv00481
Plaintiff:
Michael Thorvald Laursen
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Laursen v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv05806
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Michael Thorvald Laursen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Apodaca v. FNU LNU et al
as 1:2018cv00504
Defendant:
FNU LNU , M. Bowen , A. Laursen and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Andrew Apodaca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Laursen v. Sather et al
as 4:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
Michael Thorvald Laursen
Defendant:
Unknown Sather, D Lee, JT Shartle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathews v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv14038
Plaintiff:
Cecil Bradley Mathews
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Skipper, McCracken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
