Cases 1 - 10 of 12,575
Williams v. Hardin County Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
Hardin County Detention Center, J. Cinblon and Sgt. E. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sashinger v. Logan et al
as 2:2024cv00926
Plaintiff:
Crystal Sashinger
Defendant:
c/o Logan, Warden Reubart, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCKENZIE v. LEWIS
as 5:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
VERNON LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis-Bey v. Cox
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Carlos Devon Lewis-Bey
Defendant:
J W Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Starnes v. Ward et al
as 6:2024cv03046
Plaintiff:
Tracy Wright Starnes
Defendant:
Paul Ward, Seth Mills, Greenville County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. United States
as 3:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Wayne Lewis
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JORDAN v. WARD et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANK JORDAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, SHARON LEWIS, DR AYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Monderen v. Stange et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kenneth Monderen, Sr.
Defendant:
William Stange, Latonia Young-Griffin, Timothy Seabaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
