Cases 1 - 10 of 53,875
Keraghan v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Robert Keraghan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMALL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SMALL
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. DPSCS et al
as 1:2024cv01594
Plaintiff:
Robert William Warren, Jr
Defendant:
DPSCS, JCI Warden, JCI Ast. Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing et al v. Byrd et al
as 3:2024cv50213
Plaintiff:
Javion Ewing and Jazariah Lyles
Defendant:
David Byrd, City of DeKalb, DeKalb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Self, Carl v. Cromwell, Dan et al
as 3:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Carl F. Self
Defendant:
Dan Cromwell, Timothy Thomas, Anna Barrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NOBLE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. NOBLE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Derrick DeShun Roberts
Defendant:
J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
England v. USA
as 6:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Robert Christopher England
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bailey v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
James Robert Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. Burleson County
as 24-50430
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cordell Williams
Defendant:
Burleson County, Texas, Gene Hermes, Burleson County Sheriff, Judge Reva L. Townslee Corbett and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
