Cases 1 - 10 of 2,319
Sherman v. USA
as 8:2024cv00201
Petitioner:
Terrence Sherman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SHERMAN v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN SHERMAN
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Chavez v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Chavez
Defendant:
Rob St. Andre, Mitchell Knedler, Darrow Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Sherman et al
as 3:2024cv03113
Plaintiff:
Joseph Austin
Defendant:
Joseph Sherman, Michael Hendricks and Bobby Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Zinman v. Llamas et al
as 2:2024cv01307
Plaintiff:
Justin Marcus Zinman
Defendant:
P. Llamas, J. Sherman, Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Zinman v. CDCR Personnel et al
as 2:2024cv01305
Plaintiff:
Justin Marcus Zinman
Defendant:
CDCR Personnel, P. Llamas, J. Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Zinman v. Llamas et al
as 1:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Justin Marcus Zinman Doing business as American Media Intelligence
Defendant:
P. Llamas, J. Sherman, Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarence Jenkins, Jr. v. Sherman Campbell
as 24-1382
Petitioner:
CLARENCE REED JENKINS, JR.
Respondent:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden
Terrence Hammock v. Zowie Barnes
as 24-6375
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE EDWARD HAMMOCK, JR.
Defendant:
DR. ZOWIE BARNES, M.D., DIRECTOR GAIL WATTS, OFFICER J. SHERMAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
