Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Darryl Hudson v. C. Pfeiffer, et al
as 22-17002
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL W. HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
C. PFEIFFER, Warden, R. COX, J. DIAZ and others
Douglas Hoglan v. A. Robinson
as 22-7265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. HOGLAN
Defendant / Appellee:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations for VDOC, K. CROWDER-AUSTIN, Regional Ombudsman, ADINA L. POGUE, Western Region Operations Manager at VDOC and others
Defendant:
MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator and MELISSA WELCH, Operations Support Manager for VDOC
(PC) Hudson v. Pfeiffer et al
as 1:2022cv01313
Plaintiff:
Darryl W. Hudson
Defendant:
C. Pfeiffer, Lambo and Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hudson v. Pfeiffer et al
as 2:2022cv01744
Plaintiff:
Darryl W. Hudson
Defendant:
C. Pfeiffer, Lambo and Chavez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven W. Hudson v. Mark Feller
as 22-1094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN W. HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK FELLER, Officer
Douglas Hoglan v. A. David Robinson
as 17-7169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS A. HOGLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations for VDOC, K. CROWDER-AUSTIN, Regional Ombudsman, MARCUS ELAM, Regional Administrator and others
Andre Ganeous v. Warden Lewisburg USP, et al
as 14-1670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE GANEOUS
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP, A. W. HUDSON, JOHNSON, Lieutenant and others
Hudson v. Duffy
as 3:2013cv03782
Petitioner:
Darryl W. Hudson
Respondent:
R. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cox v. Washington et al
as 1:2013cv00291
Plaintiff:
Torrance Dwayne Cox
Defendant:
Eric D. Washington and Benjamin W. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. McGinnis et al
as 2:2013cv00204
Plaintiff:
William M. Wilson
Defendant:
Frances E. McGinnis, Theresa A. Whitt and Lori W. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
