Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Tucker v. Clark
as 7:2023cv00254
Petitioner:
Antron Adon Tucker
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aaron Flemons v. Marcus Etherly, et al
as 23-1595
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Aaron Anthony Flemons
Defendant / Appellee:
Marcus Etherly, Captain, EARU Maximum Security Unit, Morieon Kelly, Lieutenant, EARU Maximum Security Unit, Angela Douglas, ADON, Infirmary and others
Tapia v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Tapia
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Posey, Unknown Bresan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Shinn et al
as 4:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Thomas M James
Defendant:
David Shinn, Diana Labar, Jillian Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. S/CO Lima et al
as 2:2022cv01622
Plaintiff:
Adon Banks
Defendant:
S/CO Lima, C/O Wilson and Calvin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALTAGRACIA v. VIOLA et al
as 1:2021cv13017
Defendant:
SCPO JEFFREY GROSS, CPSGT RYAN PEPPER, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
ALTAGRACIA CARLOS and CARLOS ALTAGRACIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Daniels et al
as 3:2020cv00648
Defendant:
Charels Daniels and Perry Russel
Plaintiff:
Adon Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Quadri v. Stanly et al
as 4:2020cv00007
Not Classified By Court:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Defendant:
Adon Pearson, James Stanly, Jake Schultz and others
Plaintiff:
Kayode Quadri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00334
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee James Martin
Defendant:
Adon Vanderkelk, Corizon Health Care, Charles Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shank v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04638
Defendant:
Adam Perkins, Matthew B Gretzer, Adon Kabongo and others
Plaintiff:
David Shank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
