Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(HC) Freeman v. Hill
as 2:2021cv01982
Petitioner:
Dorn Allen Freeman
Respondent:
Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman v. United States
as 2:2020cv00029
Petitioner:
Gerald Allen Freeman
Respondent:
United States and Warden FCI Butner Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lovelace et al v. Wright et al
as 6:2020cv01977
Plaintiff:
Protection and Advocacy for the People with Disabilities Inc, John and Jane Does 1-10, Brandon Lee Lovelace and others
Defendant:
Chuck Wright and Allen Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Wright et al
as 4:2019cv03235
Defendant:
Deputy R. Williams, Ebony Black, Sergeant Kyle W. Center and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Wright et al
as 6:2019cv02856
Defendant:
Allen Freeman and Chuck Wright
Plaintiff:
Doron H Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. USA
as 2:2019cv00028
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gerald Allen Freeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DeJesus-Brito v. Spartanburg County Detention Facility et al
as 5:2017cv01472
Plaintiff:
Carlos Rafael DeJesus-Brito
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Detention Facility, Chuck Wright, Allen Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation et al v. Spartanburg County et al
as 7:2017cv01145
Plaintiff:
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation and American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of South Carolina
Defendant:
Spartanburg County , Chuck Wright and Allen Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorn Freeman v. Evans, et al
as 10-15071
Petitioner - Appellant:
DORN ALLEN FREEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
EVANS, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Freeman v. Conway
as 1:2007cv01227
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Freeman
Respondent:
James T. Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
