Cases 1 - 10 of 42
(PC) Alva v. State of California et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
James Scott Alva
Defendant:
State of California, Warden, J. Rey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gill v. Woelfel et al
as 2:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Jordan Woelfel, S Enneper, Alex Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
APPLETON v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2022cv00434
Plaintiff:
SHARNEE APPLETON
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, BEDWELL, L. WOLF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jammes v. Appleton Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Beau D Jammes
Defendant:
Appleton Police Department, Outagamie County Circuit Court and Outagamie District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barajas v. Marino et al
as 4:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Dominic R Barajas
Defendant:
Jason Marino, PJ Alred, John Appleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
APPLETON v. VIGO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
as 2:2021cv00219
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN APPLETON
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. Lopez et al
as 7:2021cv00017
Defendant:
NFN Dean, NFN Appleton and NFN Lopez
Plaintiff:
Christopher Marquis Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chong Lee v. City of Appleton, Wisconsin, et al
as 21-1310
Defendant / Appellee:
APPLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT, CARRIE SCHNEIDER, MICHAEL GOSTISHA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHONG L. LEE
Lee v. Appleton Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00765
Defendant:
Cary Meyer, DA Carrie Schneider, Neal Rabas and others
Plaintiff:
Chong L Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Jackson v. Yniquez et al
as 1:2020cv00205
Defendant:
A. Viramontes, E. Appleton and R. Yniquez
Plaintiff:
Tony Junior Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
