Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Christopher Henry v. Nurse Lydia
as 24-6438
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT HENRY, a/k/a Chicken Man
Defendant:
NURSE LYDIA, NURSE TAMARA, NURSE BRITTANY and others
Johnson v. Indiana Dept. Correction Staff et al
as 1:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Robert Carl Johnson, Carl Johnson and Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Indiana Dept. Correction Staff, Goodwill Industries, South Bend Community Reentry Ctr. and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moyers v. Belo
as 4:2023cv02659
Plaintiff:
Michael Moyers
Defendant:
Officer Belo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Indiana Dept. Correction Staff et al
as 3:2023cv00689
Plaintiff:
Robert Carl Johnson, Carl Johnson and Robert Johnson
Defendant:
South Bend Community Reentry Ctr., Unknown Resident, Indiana Dept. Correction Staff and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Nurse Lydia et al
as 8:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Henry
Defendant:
Nurse Lydia, Nurse Tamara, Nurse Brittany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Strickland v. Blackwell et al
as 9:2018cv00104
Plaintiff:
Glen Strickland, Jr
Defendant:
M Blackwell, Sgt Gaston, Ofc Tapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heizelman v. Belo Corp. et al
as 3:2010cv01982
Plaintiff:
Robert Heizelman
Defendant:
Belo Corp., ABC News, Channel 6 and 7 News in Boise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ginwright v. Royal et al
as 5:2010cv00057
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ginwright
Defendant:
Randy F. Royal, James, JL Stapleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven McDowell v. Lydell Sheerer, et al
as 08-4435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN MCDOWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
LYDELL SHEERER, C. SEARS, C. WALLACE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
