Cases 1 - 10 of 44
John Biddle v. Administrator New Jersey State Prison, et al
as 24-1661
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. BIDDLE
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Nolan Floyd, Sr. v. Shane Weber
as 23-7143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NOLAN KINARD FLOYD, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN SHANE WEBER, CHIEF OF SECURITY KEITH ARNOLD, LT. JAMES SMITH and others
Burke v. Quality Corrections Healthcare et al
as 2:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dave Burke
Defendant:
Quality Corrections Healthcare, C.E.O. Johnny E. Bates, Doctor Kern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
BIDDLE v. PLUMMER-LONG
as 1:2022cv01319
Plaintiff:
MARK E. BIDDLE
Defendant:
CHASITY PLUMMER-LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
HARKER v. CORNELIUS et al
as 1:2021cv20284
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE CLARK HARKER
Defendant:
SHANNON CORNELIUS, JOHN CUZZUE, HOBART RILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BIDDLE v. PERTORIUS et al
as 1:2021cv02660
Plaintiff:
MARK E. BIDDLE
Defendant:
PERTORIUS, ROBBERT CARTER, JR., JEREMY JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke v. St. Elizabeth Hospital et al
as 2:2021cv00113
Plaintiff:
Davon Burke
Defendant:
St. Elizabeth Hospital, C.O. Williams, C.O. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
VOGT v. WEISNER et al
as 1:2021cv00774
Defendant:
CINDY WEISNER, BIDDLE and GREENLEE
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER VOGT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
