Cases 1 - 10 of 425
Bowling v. Spohn et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Roger Bowling
Defendant:
Nathan Spohn, Unknown James and Unknown Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Bowles
as 1:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
James L. Brown
Respondent:
K. Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowman v. Chambless et al
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Hywel C. Bowman
Defendant:
Michael Chambless, Abby Cassady, Geoffrey Gleitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roman Monzon v. Kemsy Bowles
as 24-6281
Plaintiff:
ROMAN SEBASTIAN MONZON
Defendant:
KEMSY BOWLES and KEVIN PUNTURI
Monzon v. Bowles et al
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
Kemsy Bowles and Kevin Punturi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowles v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowles
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacques, Patrick v. Captain Bowles et al
as 7:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Captain Bowles, S. Scott, Counselor Calton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Juan Alvarado-Gonzalez v. Christopher Thompson, et al
as 24-1122
Plaintiff:
JUAN ALVARADO-GONZALEZ
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON, Warden, Pinckneyville CC, DUSTIN BOWLES, C/O, Pinckneyville CC, MAC-SHANE FRANK, Lieutenant, Pinckneyville CC and others
Lumpkin v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections, Kemsy Bowles, K.T. Punturi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Bowles
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
James L. Brown
Defendant:
Kemsy Bowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
