Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Daniels v. Linder et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Darryl C. Daniels
Defendant:
D. Linder, John Robert Houston and E. Brewer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. ARROYO et al
as 4:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
DARRYL C DANIELS
Defendant:
CHRISTINE L ARROYO, MS HEMLINGER, MRS MCCALPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. McCoy et al
as 2:2023cv00705
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Defendant:
K. McCoy, Tanya Asher, J. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels v. People of the State Kentucky et al
as 5:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Daniels
Defendant:
People of the State Kentucky, Cookie Crews, Todd D. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Eric C. Daniels
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Askari #284072 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
JaJa'Amiri M Askari
Defendant:
David Shinn, Lori Stickley, Wendy Eccles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darryl Daniels v. Z. Culpepper, et al
as 22-12805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL C. DANIELS
Defendant / Appellee:
Z. CULPEPPER, Florida Department of Corrections Regional Director, JANE DOE and MELVIN, Classification Supervisor
Cook v. Daniels et al
as 4:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Joe H Cook, III
Defendant:
C Daniels and F Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. CULPEPPER et al
as 5:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
DARRYL C DANIELS
Defendant:
Z CULPEPPER, JANE DOE I and MELVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. TAYLOR et al
as 5:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
DARRYL C DANIELS
Defendant:
CHANDA TAYLOR and FNU R TAYLOR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
