Cases 1 - 10 of 826
Hudson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00561
Petitioner:
Roy Hudson
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory Cook v. Michelle Dunham, et al
as 24-1466
Plaintiff:
GREGORY J. COOK, JR.
Defendant:
MICHELLE DUNHAM, GOA Mailroom, CARRIE KIENITZ, GOA Mailroom, SARAH SCHROEDER, Warden and others
Perry v. Briseno et al
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Jamie Phillip Perry
Defendant:
Carri Briseno, Katherin Arnold, Michigan, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bethel v. Bridges
as 4:2024cv00247
Petitioner:
Terrico Bethel
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mink v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024cv00484
Petitioner:
Damon Lee Mink
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00480
Petitioner:
Bryan Frank Perry
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whatley v. Lape et al
as 2:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Perry Lee Whatley and Pairi Omari Will El Rey
Defendant:
Kathleen Lape, Douglas Ullrich, Dennis Alerding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roman Monzon v. Sherrie Hatch
as 24-6412
Plaintiff:
ROMAN SEBASTIAN MONZON
Defendant:
SHERRIE HATCH, KAY GARVEY, CARRIE TAYLOR and others
Barnett v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00439
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Respondent:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornsberry v. Granville et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Christopher A Thornsberry
Defendant:
Carrie Granville, Arkansas Department of Correction, Streeter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
