Cases 1 - 10 of 96
David Pannell v. Sarah Eads, et al
as 23-2990
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PANNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH EADS, KEITH HARTZELL, ROBERT CARTER and others
David Pannell v. Sarah Eads, et al
as 23-2972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PANNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
SARAH EADS, KEITH HARTZELL, ROBERT CARTER and others
Ledford v. Williams et al
as 6:2023cv06091
Plaintiff:
Shane Lee Ledford
Defendant:
Judge Chris Williams and Dep Prosecuting Atty A. Davis Jared
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Guerin et al
as 3:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Columbus Chris Williams
Defendant:
K Guerin, Jeff Landry, James M. LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Columbus Chris Williams
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, John Bell Edwards, Jeff Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bordelon et al
as 3:2023cv00105
Petitioner:
Columbus Chris Williams
Respondent:
Donnie Bordelon and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Guerin
as 23-30045
Petitioner / Appellant:
Columbus Chris Williams
Respondent / Appellee:
Kirt Guerin, Warden, Elayn Hunt Correctional Center
Williams v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv00030
Petitioner:
Columbus Chris Williams
Respondent:
State of Louisiana, John Bell Edwards, Jeff Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Bordelon et al
as 3:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Columbus Chris Williams
Defendant:
Donnie Bordelon, John Bel Edwards, Jeff Landry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2022cv00552
Plaintiff:
DEREK BOYD
Defendant:
ZATECKY, BRANDON MILLER, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
