Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney David P. Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Warden Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant:
David P Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotten #222471 v. Thornell et al
as 3:2024cv08004
Petitioner:
Joseph Ken Cotten
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Kris Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BRYANT BRANCH v. STRONG et al
as 4:2022cv00112
Petitioner:
AUNDRIA BRYANT BRANCH
Respondent:
ERIKA STRONG, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JON P MCCALLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. DeSoto Parish Detention Center
as 5:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Latellas Moore
Defendant:
DeSoto Parish Detention Center, Warden Billy Cotten, Sgt Woodley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cotten v. Wainwright
as 1:2020cv00565
Defendant:
Wainwright
Plaintiff:
Cotten
Respondent:
Warden Lyneal Wainwright
Petitioner:
Prince Charles Cotten, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cotten v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv02904
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
DeWayne Michael Cotten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cotten v. Marques
as 1:2019cv00243
Respondent:
Warden Dave Marques
Petitioner:
Prince Charles Cotten, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COTTEN v. UNITED STATES et al
as 4:2019cv00021
Defendant:
FAIRCHILD, UNITED STATES, LANGFORD and others
Plaintiff:
ERNESTINE COTTEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cotten v. Oda
as 1:2019cv00017
Defendant:
Donald E. Oda, II
Plaintiff:
Prince Charles Cotten, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
