Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Farwell v. Curry County et al
as 1:2024cv01109
Defendant:
Jeremy L. Krohn, Shawnee A. Wallace, Curry County and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford Scott Farwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooke v. USA
as 1:2020cv00031
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Clifford Scott Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cooke v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv00860
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Clifford Scott Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clifford Scott Eaton v. United State
as 13-3425
Petitioner - Appellant:
Clifford Scott Eaton
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Clifford Medley v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-10966
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLIFFORD SCOTT MEDLEY
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Eaton v. USA
as 1:2012cv00084
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Clifford Scott Eaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cook v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2008cv01871
Plaintiff:
Clifford Scott Cook
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Richard Allen and Correctional Medical Services
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cook v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00749
Plaintiff:
Clifford Scott Cook
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Richard Allen and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Medley v. Thaler
as 2:2007cv00051
Petitioner:
Clifford Scott Medley
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fisher v. D.R.D.C. Medical Dept. et al
as 1:2007cv00379
Plaintiff:
Clifford Scott Fisher
Defendant:
D.R.D.C. Medical Dept., Oba, Laura Dickinson and others
Interested Party:
Case Manager of Clifford Scott Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
