Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Dijon Dixon v. Eric Erwin, et al
as 23-5377
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIJON T. DIXON
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIC A. ERWIN, Assistant Warden, UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY AT BIG SANDY, HECTOR JOYNER, Warden and others
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy et al
as 7:2021cv00026
Defendant:
A. Carter, J. Price, M. Lefever and others
Plaintiff:
Dijon T. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv01052
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Monroe
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., John R. Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Monroe et al
as 3:2015cv00588
Plaintiff:
Jamonte D. Baker
Defendant:
Rodney D. Monroe, Brian Scharf, Michael B. Peacock and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Pringle v. Monroe
as 3:2015cv00512
Plaintiff:
Roger Pringle
Defendant:
Chris D Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pringle v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2015cv00484
Plaintiff:
Roger Pringle
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Aaron J Edwards, Chris D Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tigano v. Whitesell et al
as 6:2015cv06093
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tigano, III
Defendant:
James Whitesell, Ricky L. Whitney, Kevin D. Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. POVALERI et al
as 2:2014cv00220
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DAVIS
Defendant:
TAMI HINES, CHRIS D. MONROE and GAIL POVALERI
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Ginsel et al
as 9:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Clifford Dwayne Jones
Defendant:
Cody Ginsel, G Hunter, Gary L Currie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bullabough v. Monroe et al
as 3:2011cv00670
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Bullabough
Respondent:
Rodney D. Monroe, Huntersville Police Department, Jennifer Sprague and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
