Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LEE v. WATSON, et al.
as 2:2020cv00359
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Defendant:
T.J. WATSON and WILLIAM BARR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
LEE V. BARR, et al
as 2:2020cv00357
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Defendant:
T.J. WATSON, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
PURKEY v. BARR et al
as 2:2019cv00517
Defendant:
TAYLOR, J.T. WATSON, HUGH HURWITZ and others
Plaintiff:
WESLEY I. PURKEY
Interested Party:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LEE v. WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE et al
as 2:2019cv00468
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
Petitioner:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEE v. BARR et al
as 1:2019cv02559
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I-X, UTTAM DHILLON, KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS LEE
Not Classified By Court:
DUSTIN LEE HONKEN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
as 1:2019mc00145
Defendant:
CHADRICK EVAN FULKS, PAUL LAIRD, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
ALFRED BOURGEOIS, JULIUS ROBINSON, JAMES H. ROANE, JR., and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BRUCE WEBSTER, ANTHONY BATTLE and ORLANDO HALL
Intervenor Defendant:
RICHARD VEACH
Intervenor:
JEFFREY PAUL
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS' EXECUTION PROTOCOL CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lee v. USA
as 4:2018cv00649
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Daniel Lewis Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Daniel Lee
as 14-2853
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Lewis Lee, also known as Daniel Lewis Graham, also known as Danny Lee, also known as D L Graham
United States v. Daniel Lee
as 11-1380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Lewis Lee, also known as Daniel Lewis Graham, also known as Danny Lee, also known as D L Graham
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
