Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rhodes v. Dept. of Corr. at Mat-Su Pre-Trial et al
as 3:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Rodney R. Rhodes
Defendant:
Dept. of Corr. at Mat-Su Pre-Trial, Sherry Olsen, Dorren Kitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sales v. Peterson et al
as 3:2017cv08193
Plaintiff:
Eric Sales
Defendant:
Unknown Peterson, Unknown Deets, Dave Rush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Colorado Department, et al
as 16-1141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUVENCIA DARSHA TOWNSEND
Defendant - Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EVERINGHAM, ROACH and others
Townsend v. Colorado department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv02961
Plaintiff:
Juvencia Darsha Townsend
Defendant:
Colorado department of Corrections, Roatch, Traxles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Townsend v. Eliot et al
as 1:2014cv02962
Plaintiff:
Juvencia Townsend
Defendant:
Kimberly Eliot, Mark Altholz, McFee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkley v. Deets et al
as 5:2012cv06131
Plaintiff:
John Brinkley
Defendant:
Deets, Robert Lima and Ryan Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deet v. Matthew et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv01049
Plaintiff:
Samuel Deet
Defendant:
Michael G. Matthew and Kevin Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Deet v. Jefferson County Jail Bessemer, et al
as 10-10121
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL DEET
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFERSON COUNTY JAIL BESSEMER, RODRIGUEZ GARNER, SGT JOHNSON and others
Deet v. Jefferson County Jail Bessemer et al
as 2:2009cv01036
Plaintiff:
Samuel Deet
Defendant:
Jefferson County Jail Bessemer, Rodriguez Garner, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deets v. Castilo et al
as 3:2008cv00655
Plaintiff:
Randy Deets
Defendant:
c/o Castilo, Howard Skolnik, Dr. Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
