Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Petty v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv01660
Plaintiff:
Daniel R Petty
Defendant:
Dr Doe, Nurse Lory Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilgore v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv00332
Defendant:
Medical Dept., Dr. Doe #1, Dr. Jane Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEARDEN v. CLEVELAND et al
as 3:2019cv00081
Plaintiff:
CURTIS JUSTIN BEARDEN
Defendant:
DR DOE, NURSE MARIE DOE, LIEUTENANT J J DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOYI v. COUNTY OF MONMOUTH et al
as 3:2019cv15605
Defendant:
CO MCMEMENE, COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, MONMOUTH JAIL MEDICAL COMPANY DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CARL KOYI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris, Jr. v. Barnes et al
as 1:2018cv07352
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Ms. Doe Barnes, Supervisors John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Cosmin F. Harris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Barnes et al
as 1:2018cv11599
Defendant:
JANE DOE, Ms. Doe Barnes, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Jr Cosmin F Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sammons v. Overton et al
as 7:2018cv00497
Defendant:
Bobby Russell, Franklin Co. Board of Supervisors, Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Sammons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald F. Martinez v. Dr. Doe No. 1 et al
as 2:2017cv03208
Defendant:
Dr. Doe No. 1, Dr. Doe No. 1, Head Nurse Doe No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald F Martinez
Class v. Bronx County Supreme Court et al
as 1:2017cv00316
Plaintiff:
Rafael Class
Defendant:
Bronx County Supreme Court, Bronx District Attorney, 18B Assignment Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ouellette v. Kennebec Behavioral Health, et al
as 15-1284
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL A. OUELLETTE
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNEBEC BEHAVIORAL HEALTH, LOOKING AHEAD CLUBHOUSE, KENNETH LEHMAN and others
Defendant:
ANDERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
