Cases 1 - 10 of 31
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00688
Petitioner:
Demetrius Jackson
Defendant:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jamon Jackson v. Smith State Prison, et al
as 22-11683
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMON DEMETRIUS JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
SMITH STATE PRISON and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jackson v. Simpson et al
as 3:2022cv00240
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Jackson
Defendant:
Mike Simpson and LT John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Howard et al
as 1:2020cv01253
Defendant:
Lehman Brothers, Paine Webber Group, Paul Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Jamon Demetrius Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Ward et al
as 6:2019cv00091
Defendant:
Warden Terrence Kilpatrick and Commissioner Timothy C. Ward
Plaintiff:
Jamon Demetrius Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Ward et al
as 6:2019cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jamon Demetrius Jackson, Travis Cummings, Christopher Brown and others
Defendant:
Warden Terrence Kilpatrick and Commissionner Timothy C. Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. PAINE WEBBER GROUP et al
as 5:2019cv00293
Defendant:
AMERICAN BANKING ASSOCIATION, LEHMAN BROTHERS and PAINE WEBBER GROUP
Plaintiff:
JAMON DEMETRIUS JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00132
Defendant:
JOAN HEATH, FRYE and GREGORY C DOZIER
Plaintiff:
JAMON DEMETRIUS JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dozier et al
as 1:2019cv00506
Defendant:
Gregory C. Dozier, Dr. Frye and Joan Heath
Plaintiff:
Jamon Demetrius Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
