Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Davis v. Akima Global Services et al
as 1:2024cv00318
Plaintiff: Damion G.V Davis
Defendant: Akima Global Services, Malony, Glennon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyer v. Gaines et al
as 2:2024cv00280
Plaintiff: Lester R Dyer, III
Defendant: Sgt. Perrin Gaines, Kevin Mosley, Nathaniel Schuh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ojo v. Decker
as 22-1641
Plaintiff / Appellant: David Olukayode Ojo
Defendant / Appellee: H.O. Thomas Decker, Thomas E. Feeley, Robert F. Judge and others
Defendant: John Tsoukaris, Margo Struass, Officer Anderson and others
Chesley et al v. Polis et al
as 1:2021cv02178
Plaintiff: James M. Chesley, Raul Gallegos, Ramon K. Nero and others
Defendant: Jared Polis, Nathan B. Coats, Tyler S. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dysart v. USA
as 2:2019cv12317
Petitioner: Terrell Dewayne Dysart
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dysart v. USA
as 2:2019cv11867
Petitioner: Terrell Dewayne Dysart
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McRae v. Beverly et al
as 6:2018cv06459
Plaintiff: Troy McRae
Defendant: Beverly, Schenk, Dysart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mattice-Bey v. Rendon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00639
Plaintiff: Jasaun Robert Mattice-Bey
Defendant: Carole S. Rendon, Michelle M. Baeppler, James A. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. Dysart
as 5:2015ct03017
Plaintiff: Michael Rankins
Defendant: Christian Dysart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dysart v. Morris et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00002
Plaintiff: Glenn Jude Dysart
Defendant: Michelle Morris and Herbert Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?