Cases 1 - 10 of 497
(PC) Abdullah v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
B. Phillips, C. Critchlow, E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Arresting Officers et al
as 4:2024cv01911
Plaintiff:
Nicole E. Smith
Defendant:
Arresting Officers, Houston Police Department and Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MaCcormack v. Well Path Correct Care Solution LLC et al
as 1:2024cv11140
Plaintiff:
Andrew MaCcormack
Defendant:
Well Path Correct Care Solution LLC, James Hwang and Therese E Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Smith v. Officer Foster, et al
as 24-1391
Plaintiff:
KEVIN E. SMITH
Defendant:
OFFICER FOSTER, OFFICER MARTIN, OFFICER BENNETT and others
Smith v. USA
as 1:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
Nathan E. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith v. Labarge et al
as 9:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Sincere Smith
Defendant:
Labarge, C.O. A.N. Martin, C.O. A.U. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Labarge et al
as 7:2023cv10264
Plaintiff:
Sincere Smith
Defendant:
Sgt. Labarge, C.O. A.N. Martin, C.O. A.U. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dison v. Reaves et al
as 2:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Dison Jr. and Donald Ray Dison, Jr
Defendant:
R. Reaves, L. Para, E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Smith v. Officer Foster, et al
as 23-3007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN E. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER FOSTER, OFFICER MARTIN, OFFICER BENNETT and others
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00834
Petitioner:
Kevin E Smith and Kevin Eugene Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
