Cases 1 - 10 of 4,490
Cuello Ferreras v. Warden of FCI Oxford
as 2:2024cv00617
Petitioner:
Herpis Cuello Ferreras
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brinson v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Raheem T. Brinson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
OLUWADAMILARE v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06201
Petitioner:
ADELKE B. OLUWADAMILARE
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Flores, Ramon v. Warden of FCI - Oxford
as 3:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Ramon Flores
Respondent:
Warden of FCI - Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kenneth Mobley v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5477
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MOBLEY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN F. J. BOWERS, FCI Memphis and others
SANCHEZ-LEYVA v. Warden, FCI Fort Dix
as 1:2024cv06118
Petitioner:
GERARDO ANTONIO SANCHEZ-LEYVA
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cervantes v. Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
as 3:2024cv00323
Petitioner:
Rafael Cervantes
Respondent:
Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 f
Saenz-Quintero v. FCI Bennetsville (WARDEN)
as 0:2024cv03009
Petitioner:
Jose Saenz-Quintero
Respondent:
FCI Bennetsville (WARDEN)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Corrales v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Duarte-Vasquez v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Duarte-Vasquez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
