Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Brown v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
George Brown
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRELL et al v. ROBINSON
as 3:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
QUINYATLE J HARRELL, DASHONE BURTON, GREENE ALGERNON and others
Defendant:
ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry Brown v. Tony George, et al
as 23-1584
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY GEORGE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY GEORGE, also known as Eric, TYRONE GRAY, JOHN DOE, Paramedic # 1-2 and others
Malone v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Carlos C. Malone and Carlos C Malone
Defendant:
Sheriff Vic Regalado, Tulsa County Sheriffs Office, Undersheriff George Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. United States of America
as 21-1530
Petitioner / Appellant:
Donald George Brown and Derrick Riley
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv05007
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GEORGE BROWN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gibson v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2020cv01455
Defendant:
Darri McGuire, Parris Price, Jason Pequeen and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. USA
as 1:2020cv02202
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Donald George Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brown v. Marsh et al
as 3:2019cv02229
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General Office and Robert Marsh
Petitioner:
George Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEFENDERS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA, PA et al
as 2:2019cv05856
Defendant:
ROSSMAN DEWITT THOMPSON, JR., FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEFENDERS FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA, PA, DOE 1, ESQ. and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL GEORGE BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
