Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bridgeford v. Cornachia et al
as 1:2022cv00700
Plaintiff:
Douglass Bridgeford
Defendant:
Warden Cornachia, Warden Bohrer, Custody Chief Lohman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2018cv00153
Defendant:
Brooke Boyles, Hendricks, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Wayne Lane, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson Jr. v. Steel et al
as 8:2018cv01405
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Johnson Jr.
Defendant:
J. Steel, Joseph Lohman and State Rep Godlove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baden v. Dovey et al
as 8:2017cv02964
Plaintiff:
Rico Baden
Defendant:
Richard Dovey, Godlove, Boyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STUDNICKA v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS STAFF, DEFENDANTS et al
as 2:2010cv00259
Defendant:
ANNONYMOUS, ANONYMOUS, ANYNOMUS and others
Plaintiff:
MR. SEAN ALLEN STUDNICKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STUDNICKA v. PROFIT et al
as 2:2010cv00188
Defendant:
JENNIFER GODLOVE, MR. LAPPIN, MS. LOCKETT and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN A. STUDNICKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STUDNICKA et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2010cv00137
Defendant:
MS. BIEGLEY, MR. BOBO, A. W. DEBRAIN and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN A. STUDNICKA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Short v. Jones et al
as 5:2008cv00339
Plaintiff:
Terry Lyn Short
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Marty Sirmons, Ernest Godlove and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edwards v. Rainey et al
as 6:2008cv00089
Plaintiff:
Leon Ricardo Edwards
Defendant:
Robert Rainey, Mark Luttrull, Ernest Godlove and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edwards v. Ward et al
as 6:2007cv00299
Plaintiff:
Leon Edwards
Defendant:
Ron Ward, Robert Rainey, Mark Luttrull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
