Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Hankerson et al v. Wilson et al
as 0:2017cv00295
Plaintiff:
Willie C. Hankerson
Defendant:
Denese Wilson, Harold Watts, Paul Laird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
as 2:2016cv02954
Petitioner:
Harold Watts
Respondent:
Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00635
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Magluta v. United States Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2011cv02381
Plaintiff:
Salvador Magluta
Defendant:
United States Federal Bureau of Prisons, Thomas R. Kane, Michael Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Holz v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 11-56418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. MCFADDEN, Regional Director, J. L. NORWOOD, FCC Warden, HODAK, Captain, SIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-7066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Timothy Holz v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 11-56193
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT MCFADDEN, Regional Director, J. L. NORWOOD, FCC Warden, HODAK, Captain, SIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-6810
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mackey v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2010cv02192
Plaintiff:
Evaristus Mackey
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin, Harold Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gillon v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 10-1425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INGMAR GILLON
Defendant - Appellee:
THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN BLAKE DAVIS, US PENITENTIARY FLORENCE COLORADO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
